The Next Generation Arrives
RTX 5090 (Blackwell, $1,599) vs AMD RX 9700 XT (RDNA 5, $549). We tested both across gaming, content creation, and AI workloads.
Architecture
RTX 5090: 21,760 CUDA cores on TSMC 4nm, 32GB GDDR7, 384-bit bus, 450W TDP. RX 9700 XT: 7,680 stream processors on TSMC 4nm, 16GB GDDR6X, 256-bit bus, 250W TDP.
Gaming
RTX 5090: 120+ FPS at 4K max settings. With DLSS 4 Frame Gen, often 200+ FPS. RX 9700 XT: 85-100 FPS at 4K, frequently 144+ FPS at 1440p. AMD FSR 4 nearly matches DLSS quality. Value: 9700 XT delivers 65% of 5090 performance at 34% of the price.
Ray Tracing
NVIDIA’s stronghold. RTX 5090 handles full path tracing in Cyberpunk at 80+ FPS 4K with DLSS. AMD improved significantly but still needs FSR and reduced RT settings for demanding titles.
Content Creation
RTX 5090 untouchable for 8K editing in DaVinci Resolve. 32GB VRAM dominates. AMD competitive in Blender and general 3D rendering.
AI/ML
RTX 5090 is the only choice for local AI work. CUDA ecosystem, Tensor Cores, 32GB VRAM make it a legitimate workstation GPU.
Power
5090: 450W, needs 850W+ PSU, loud under load. 9700 XT: 250W, quiet, works with 650W PSU. $50-100/year power cost difference.
Verdict
RTX 5090 for 4K 120Hz+, ray tracing, content creation, AI. RX 9700 XT for 1440p high-refresh gaming and best value — our recommendation for the majority of gamers in 2026.
Disclosure: WikiWax may earn a commission from qualifying purchases through affiliate links on this page. This does not affect our editorial integrity or the price you pay.